borg|chat
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Lee Duna to [email protected]English • 2 years ago

Elon Musk’s Neuralink begins accepting human patients for trials of its brain implant

venturebeat.com

external-link
message-square
38
fedilink
62
external-link

Elon Musk’s Neuralink begins accepting human patients for trials of its brain implant

venturebeat.com

Lee Duna to [email protected]English • 2 years ago
message-square
38
fedilink
Are you at least 22 years old and do you have quadriplegia from a spinal cord injury, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)?
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    50•2 years ago

    Obligatory “What could possibly go wrong? /s”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    43•2 years ago

    For that thing that killed hundreds of monkeys? Yeah, sounds like a great plan.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      35•2 years ago

      “only” 15-17 monkeys, but thousands of other animals, insanely depressing. the more you read about it, the more you will start to actually believe that the death of one particular primate could indeed be beneficial for humanity …

      On several occasions over the years, Musk has told employees to imagine they had a bomb strapped to their heads in an effort to get them to move faster, according to three sources who repeatedly heard the comment. On one occasion a few years ago, Musk told employees he would trigger a “market failure” at Neuralink unless they made more progress, a comment perceived by some employees as a threat to shut down operations, according to a former staffer who heard his comment. Five people who’ve worked on Neuralink’s animal experiments told Reuters they had raised concerns internally. They said they had advocated for a more traditional testing approach, in which researchers would test one element at a time in an animal study and draw relevant conclusions before moving on to more animal tests. Instead, these people said, Neuralink launches tests in quick succession before fixing issues in earlier tests or drawing complete conclusions. The result: More animals overall are tested and killed, in part because the approach leads to repeated tests. One former employee who asked management several years ago for more deliberate testing was told by a senior executive it wasn’t possible given Musk’s demands for speed, the employee said. Two people told Reuters they left the company over concerns about animal research.

  • AnonTwo
    link
    fedilink
    33•2 years ago

    Is there no government oversight for “Uhh no you aren’t?”

    Given the recent animal testing results this seems like assisted suicide

    • NaN
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4•2 years ago

      There was, they were not initially approved.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32•2 years ago

    Ole Musky should step up and prove how safe it is. If he gets one, I’ll definitely get one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19•2 years ago

      One implant to rule them all, one implant to find them, One implant to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16•2 years ago

      He behaves like he already has one.

      • ivanafterall
        link
        fedilink
        13•2 years ago

        Oh shit, what if the purchase of Twitter, change to X, etc…etc…is all due to brain implant side effects… Someone get this conspiracy going!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2•2 years ago

        So then the thing that killed the monkeys was the smelling their smug farts all day? It all makes sense now…

      • NaN
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1•2 years ago

        He thinks we’re living in a simulation.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    30•2 years ago

    Lol this guy can’t even make a car that doesn’t kill someone or have a bumper that doesn’t fall off

    • ivanafterall
      link
      fedilink
      11•2 years ago

      I shudder to think what the human equivalent of “fully autonomous driving” or a launchpad explosion looks like.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7•2 years ago

        Or even the human equivalent of a bumper falling off.

    • cooljacob204
      link
      fedilink
      -2•2 years ago

      All cars kill people. Don’t Tesla’s have a pretty decent safety rating?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -2•2 years ago

        https://www.tesladeaths.com/

        https://www.tesla-fire.com/

        • cooljacob204
          link
          fedilink
          11•
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Okay, instead of posting rage bait can you show me that more people are dying in/from Tesla’s then other vehicles per mile driven?

          And just to be clear, I don’t own a car. Nor do I care for Teslas. But you can’t claim it’s a dangerous car while not comparing it to the rest of the industry. Cars in general are really fucking unsafe.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24•2 years ago

    First rule of technology: if the increase in complexity and decrease in reliability outweigh the added tangible value, don’t implement it. This is why it’s usually best to avoid “smart” appliances or, you know, brain implants.

  • Pons_Aelius
    link
    fedilink
    23•2 years ago

    A good rule of thumb with computers and software is to never touch/buy an alpha/version 1.0 of any system as its best to let someone else sort out the major bugs.

    This is the dilemma people trying to create wetware (brain-hardware interface) face. There will be problems and how the hell any experiments to advance this pass an ethics board is beyond me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38•
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      And there’s the question of support:

      Their bionic eyes are now obsolete and unsupported

      • Pons_Aelius
        link
        fedilink
        19•
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Holy shit that is beyond terrible. It reminds me of something William Gibson would write (tech wise) with the absurdity of Douglas Adams or Kurt Vonnegut mixed in.

        And I can see this sort of thing happening again and again if this tech keeps developing over the next 50 years.

        I would now revise this to never touch any wetware interface for the next 30 years and maybe by then it will be stable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4•2 years ago

        that is just terrifying, imagine just suddenly going back to being completely blind, and then learning noone’s really out there to fix it anymore because the company behind it just went poof one day

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19•2 years ago

    If someone besides Musk was running things, I might be excited about the potential for progress… as it stands, though, I just can’t trust the guy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25•2 years ago

      Given what is coming out about how the animal test subjects were treated, you’d be better off letting a random dentist poke at your brain

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3•2 years ago

      Same.

      Although I can’t say I would trust one from a FAANG company much more.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    18•2 years ago

    I’ll bet you need a lifetime subscription with that and get a blue verification mark on your forehead.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17•2 years ago

      A 30 day lifetime subscription.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13•2 years ago

    I can see how a quadrapoligic or someone with ALS would be excited for this trial. I hope it goes well. It could give someone that is trapped in their body a new way to communicate with their loved ones.

  • Beej Jorgensen
    link
    fedilink
    12•2 years ago

    Does it support full auto-think?

    • Jack
      link
      fedilink
      13•2 years ago

      Whoever thinks getting one is a good idea already has it enabled.

    • Elise
      link
      fedilink
      2•2 years ago

      I already have that and I’m not impressed

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    9•2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8•2 years ago

    I mean look on the bright side. It’s Musk’s sycophants who would line up to die for something like this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6•2 years ago

    People would need to be force to insert this shit to be competitive in the market. This sucks

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13•
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Is anyone up for starting a non religious Amish society?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4•2 years ago

    This sucks

[email protected]

[email protected]

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

  • 222 users / day
  • 478 users / week
  • 2.51K users / month
  • 7.85K users / 6 months
  • 39K subscribers
  • 3.53K Posts
  • 46.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • @[email protected]
  • BE: 0.19.3
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org