Karna to [email protected] • 4 months agoGNOME Software May Eventually Drop RPM Support In Favor Of Flatpakswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1147arrow-down19
arrow-up1138arrow-down1external-linkGNOME Software May Eventually Drop RPM Support In Favor Of Flatpakswww.phoronix.comKarna to [email protected] • 4 months agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•4 months agoThen gnome will cease to be an option. Fucking flatpaks.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•4 months agoWhile I prefer Debian packages, what’s wrong with Flatpaks other than a bit of bloat caused by redundant dependencies? They’re not Snaps.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•4 months agoThey acutally use deduplication. So if there is a package needed in e.g. 10 different flatpaks it will not take 10x the space on the drive.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•4 months agoReally? Nice. Didn’t know that about Flatpaks.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•4 months agoIt was mentioned in a podcast from the linux cast - there was actually a guy (I believe he works for gnome) and he cleaned up with some prejudices about flatpaks. One of them being that they consume too much space on disk ;)
Then gnome will cease to be an option.
Fucking flatpaks.
While I prefer Debian packages, what’s wrong with Flatpaks other than a bit of bloat caused by redundant dependencies? They’re not Snaps.
They acutally use deduplication. So if there is a package needed in e.g. 10 different flatpaks it will not take 10x the space on the drive.
Really? Nice. Didn’t know that about Flatpaks.
It was mentioned in a podcast from the linux cast - there was actually a guy (I believe he works for gnome) and he cleaned up with some prejudices about flatpaks. One of them being that they consume too much space on disk ;)