• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 months ago

    We’re not taking about security. We’re taking about unsupervised children seeing boobies.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s exactly a security concern from a design point of view. Your desire to trivialize it doesn’t change its nature, access control is access control. That’s not what DNS is for and making it do that is going to cause everyone regret.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        302 months ago

        You’re not wrong. But if I had to pick between blocking .xxx on my kid’s device or uploading a photo of my ID to various porn sites, I know which one I’m choosing.

        • Jerkface (any/all)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -13
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          “I want people to accept a bogus solution so this will all just go away.” Okay? But surely you can appreciate that people are not likely to be moved by your bad faith suggestions.

          • मुक्त
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            Access to .xxx domains can be mandated to require detection of parental controls, and needing proper age verification if they are not in use.

            Or I am missing some design problem here?