• A bridge, you say? Then we can cross to other galaxies! Our overpopulation problems are solved!

    On a more serious note, I wonder how much this would increase our ability to cross the gulfs. Assuming we could eventually build machines that can endure for hundreds of thousands of years, would the presence of a gas bridge would make ramscoops a more viable intergalactic option?

    • Ænima
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1014 days ago

      Stuff lasting that long? Capitalism will never allow it!

      • apotheotic (she/her)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 days ago

        Imagine cashing in on a 100k year voyage which will only probably go wrong 10k-99.9k years after you die. Easy money for a capitalist, even if it involves making a vessel that can last that long

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        212 days ago

        “This is Joe from Amazon Hyperdrives, I’m calling about your centennial warranty renewal.”

        • Ænima
          link
          fedilink
          English
          212 days ago

          The future is NOW…NOw…Now…now…now…now…

    • ...m...
      link
      fedilink
      113 days ago

      …for those distances we’re talking hundreds of millions of years at relativistic velocities, even billions…

      • The Canis Major Dwarf Galaxy is only 25,000 ly from Earth. Assuming constant acceleration, and sufficient technology to protect and keep things running for all that time - no mean feat - reaching a substantial percentage of light should make that reachable within a hundred or so thousand light years, even with a flip and slow-down halfway.

        Seque 1 is only 75k ly.

        Andromeda is much farther; I didn’t catch it in the article, but I got the impression the strands were identified between the more local clusters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 days ago

        Wouldn’t the ship itself perceive a lot less of that time compared to an external point of reference?

        • ...m...
          link
          fedilink
          112 days ago

          …that’s correct: i assumed 0.01c and didn’t adjust for time dilation, which can drastically affect the calculations depending upon how far we push relativistic super-science, although the required energies are commensurately absurd…