Bloved Madman to [email protected]English • 2 years agoSurface Laptop 3 running Kubuntu, such an improvement over what it was "designed" for.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up1337arrow-down119
arrow-up1318arrow-down1imageSurface Laptop 3 running Kubuntu, such an improvement over what it was "designed" for.lemmy.worldBloved Madman to [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoEverything’s about perspective… maybe GNOME became SO bloated that KDE now seems very light. :P
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•2 years agoLook on phoronix for benchmarks. Plasma consumes less RAM and CPU than even XFCE.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 years agoHold on, I was kind of joking, I’m not saying KDE is slow. GNOME for sure is slow as hell.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 years agoAll good, but I think it’s really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case.
deleted by creator
Everything’s about perspective… maybe GNOME became SO bloated that KDE now seems very light. :P
Look on phoronix for benchmarks. Plasma consumes less RAM and CPU than even XFCE.
Hold on, I was kind of joking, I’m not saying KDE is slow. GNOME for sure is slow as hell.
All good, but I think it’s really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case.